Today, the Supreme Court of the U.S. used its emergency docket to revive a Trump Administration Clean Water Act rule that sidelined states, Tribes, and the public in permitting decisions for large projects affecting water.
SCOTUS provided no reasoning for its decision or its use of the emergency docket, normally reserved for special circumstances. Justice Kagan led a dissent from four justices including Chief Justice Roberts.
“Today the Supreme Court’s ultra-conservative majority used the emergency docket to both revive an environmentally harmful rule and severally limit the authority of lower courts, without writing a single word as to why either was appropriate,” said Andrew Hawley, attorney at the Western Environmental Law Center. “Moreover, the irony of today’s decision is that the court effectively admonished the lower court for setting aside a clearly unlawful rule on too little process, while acting with arguably less process and ignoring its own rules along the way.”
“The reinstatement of these rules will limit the ability of states to protect rivers from the harmful impact of hydropower dams on rivers and those who use them for recreation,” said Robert Nasdor, American Whitewater legal director. “These rules needlessly limit states from requiring that these projects meet state water quality standards under the Clean Water Act.”
“With today’s decision, corporate interests have been elevated above the rights of states and Indigenous Tribes, said Nic Nelson, executive director of Idaho Rivers United. “This once again clouds the public process for review and engagement.”
“The ruling today will directly result in the degradation of California’s rivers and streams and will further imperil federally and state protected salmon and steelhead,” said Redgie Collins, California Trout’s legal and policy director. “The majority of the Supreme Court has shown a disregard for precedent in this hypocritical decision that turns its back on the rights of states to choose how and when to protect their rivers.”
Background:
For nearly 50 years, decisions regarding large federally regulated projects such as pipelines, dams, industrial plants, municipal facilities, and wetland development have required state, Tribal, and federal cooperation under the Clean Water Act. The Trump administration gutted that part of the law (final 401 rule here), allowing the federal government to force such projects onto states and Tribes despite pollution risks to rivers, streams, lakes, and wetlands within their borders. The changes to the Clean Water Act’s Section 401 represent a major threat to clean water and public health from coast to coast and everywhere in between.
The rule also suppresses state and Tribal public participation processes that moor U.S. water policy in the harbor of democracy. Further, the new rule limits the information on proposed projects that may be made available to the states, Tribes, and the public.
The new rule, directly overturns Congress’ intent to integrate state and federal authority for permitting decisions affecting state waterways.
As the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality noted earlier this year, the Trump 401 rule “caused considerable implementation confusion” and “brought about the breakdown of a long-standing, formally established and cooperative process between” federal and state agencies trying to coordinate the review of federal permits and licenses under section 401 of the Clean Water Act. These problems were predictable, and the direct result of the many problems with the Trump rule. For example, according to TCEQ’s 2019 comments on the proposed rule, the “narrowed scope of certification review” in the Trump rule “conflicts with Texas state law and several of TCEQ’s rules [and] limit[ed] Texas’ authority” under section 401.
Contacts:
Andrew Hawley, Western Environmental Law Center, 206-487-7250, gro.w1734548882alnre1734548882tsew@1734548882yelwa1734548882h1734548882
Amy Kober, American Rivers, 503-708-1145, gro.s1734548882revir1734548882nacir1734548882ema@r1734548882eboka1734548882
Bob Nasdor, American Whitewater, 617-584-4566, gro.r1734548882etawe1734548882tihwn1734548882acire1734548882ma@bo1734548882b1734548882
Nic Nelson, Idaho Rivers United, 208-343-7481, gro.s1734548882revir1734548882ohadi1734548882@cin1734548882
Walter “Redgie” Collins, California Trout, 415-748-8755, gro.t1734548882uortl1734548882ac@sn1734548882illoc1734548882r1734548882
Photos for media use available here.
Letters (public comments) from states, Tribes, and organizations opposing Section 401 rollbacks:
Opposition Letter: State of South Dakota (scathing)
October 21, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/v.mLY3z2d_20191021South_Dakota_CWA_401_commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: State of Arkansas
October 21, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/5RTbsrt8~_AR_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: State of California
October 21, 2019
Opposition Letter: Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation
October 21, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/FoaQ2zvAh_20191021Yakama_Nation_Section_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: Inter Tribal Association of Arizona
October 21, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/.jk5nJ1oK_InterTribal_Assn_of_AZ_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: State of Idaho
October 21, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/kZlX31CB7_ID_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: State of Louisiana
October 19, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/F52ivsrg._LA_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin
October 22, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/UTuKpy6FF_Menominee_Tribe_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: State of Montana
October 17, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/SnoPVhxYj_MT_401_rule_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: State of Nevada
October 17, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/0BeC6MkzI_NV_401_Rule_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: State of New York
October 21, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/c0.jrsYs~_NY_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: State of Pennsylvania
October 21, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/Q9h7qFprp_PA_Comments_on_401_rulepdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: Seattle City Light
October 21, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/XDTlaYaTh_Seattle_City_Light_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: Skokomish Indian Tribe
October 20, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/NKCE.ps4l_20191020Skokomish_Tribe_Section_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: Standing Rock Sioux
October 21, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/67Ar2EyV8_Standing_Rock_Sioux_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: State of Tennessee
October 21, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/e7PdQltny_TN_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: State of Texas
October, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/SS5mPC48m_TX_401_commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians
October 14, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/hiNTrBCKr_Twenty_Nine_Palms_Band_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: State of Washington
May 24, 2019
https://pdfhost.io/v/21GYgD4xa_WA_401_Commentspdf.pdf
Opposition Letter: National Governors’ Association
October 18, 2019
Opposition Letter: Western Governors’ Association, National Conference of State Legislatures, National Association of Counties, National League of Cities, U.S. Conference of Mayors, Council of State Governments, Western Interstate Region, Association of Clean Water Administrators, Association of State Floodplain Managers, Association of State Wetland Managers, Western States Water Council
October 16, 2019
Opposition Letter: Earthjustice, Sierra Club, and 31 other organizations
October 21, 2019
Opposition Letter: Sens. Carper, Duckworth, and Booker
October 21, 2019
Opposition Letter: Southern Environmental Law Center
October 21, 2019
Opposition Letter: Rep. Peter DeFazio
July 29, 2019
English 
Español de México 
Skip to content