Today, attorneys for the 16 plaintiffs in the historic youth-led constitutional climate case, Held v. State of Montana, presented oral arguments before the Montana Supreme Court. In a packed courtroom, attorneys for the plaintiffs argued to uphold the August 2023 ruling in favor of the plaintiffs from District Court Judge Kathy Seeley declaring that the state of Montana’s laws, policies, and actions promoting fossil fuels extraction violate young people’s constitutional rights to a clean and healthful environment, including a livable climate.
After Judge Seeley’s historic ruling, the state appealed the decision to the Montana Supreme Court. The court also filed for a stay in District Court asking the court to delay its decision on Held pending appeal. Judge Seeley denied the request for stay and the state Supreme Court denied a similar request to stay the District Court’s order.
Attorney for the plaintiffs Roger Sullivan of McGarvey Law today argued that the 16 young Montanans have suffered direct and severe impacts from climate change, supported by the unchallenged scientific testimony presented at trial. He asserted that the challenges by the state to raise the bar on standing beyond proof of constitutional violation, and minimize the power of the Montana Environmental Policy Act would eviscerate the protections of Montana’s bill of rights. In his arguments, Sullivan stated:
“This case is about Montana’s climate, Montana’s constitution, and Montana’s children. These courageous young Montanans who are present in the courtroom today testified about the impacts of extreme summer heat while working on the family ranch, about their inability to breathe clean air as a result of the new ‘smoke season,’ about maintaining ancient Tribal traditions tied to the seasons and the absence of winter snow, and about impacts to their cherished landscapes all across our state, from the grandeur of our mountains to the vastness of our rolling plains. Now before you is an unparalleled trial record with findings of fact based on testimony of the youth plaintiffs and Montana’s renowned climate scientists and medical professionals which established that the reason there is a constitutional injury is because the legislature told the state agencies that they could not look at the impacts on Montana’s climate of the fossil fuel activities they permit, and so the agencies haven’t, which is why the record shows they have never denied a fossil fuel permit. This record also shows we are in a climate emergency and additional greenhouse gas emissions will cause additional heating and additional injuries to plaintiffs.”
“With this case we are working to protect our state of Montana, our people, and our land because this is our home. It is our responsibility and moral obligation, along with that of the courts, to hold our government systems accountable in ensuring our most fundamental rights are protected,” said named plaintiff Rikki Held. “Our case, ruled on by Judge Seeley last year, has laid out the best available science on climate change and related health impacts especially to young people, has shown long-standing state action against the well-being of our state and our future, and has raised the voices of us young Montanans who have already experienced the results of our state government’s actions contributing to the global climate crisis. I hope the Montana Supreme Court affirms Judge Seely’s August order to ensure our constitutional rights, including the fundamental right to a livable climate, are protected and adhered to as we lay our path for the future.”
“The scale at which the state is suggesting state agencies operate, on a permit-by-permit basis, is not appropriate to the scale of the climate emergency. A decision in favor of Held plaintiffs would offer agencies the framework within which to make constitutionally compliant decisions, and position Montana to lead systemic change. A safe, and livable climate is in all of our interests,” said Our Children’s Trust attorney Nate Bellinger. “The State should stop fighting Montana’s youth, stop prioritizing the fossil fuel industry over the best interests of its own residents, and get to work complying with the Held order. We thank the Court for hearing us today, and look forward to its ruling.”
The 16 youth plaintiffs in this case are represented by attorneys with Our Children’s Trust, the Western Environmental Law Center, and McGarvey Law.
About Held v. State of Montana:
In March of 2020, 16 youth from across Montana filed a constitutional climate suit against their state government. They asserted Montana’s support for the extraction, burning, and transport of fossil fuels ignored the facts of the climate crisis and violated their constitutional rights to a clean and healthful environment, dignity, safety, and equal protection of the law.
In a seven-day trial in June 2023, District Court Judge Kathy Seeley heard from 12 youth plaintiffs and 10 expert witnesses about how youth are harmed by their government’s policies that ignore climate change and promote the use of fossil fuels, and what science requires to protect their fundamental rights.
In August 2023, Judge Seeley ruled wholly in favor of the youth plaintiffs making Held v. State of Montana the nation’s first, winning, youth-led constitutional climate lawsuit and enshrining into law science-based protections for children’s fundamental rights.
The state filed its appeal in September 2023 to the Montana Supreme Court.
At oral argument the Montana Supreme Court has the opportunity to listen to attorneys from both sides and review the trial court record.
Contacts:
Melissa Hornbein, Western Environmental Law Center, , 406-708-3058
Helen Britto, Our Children’s Trust, , 925-588-1171
Nate Bellinger, Our Children’s Trust, , 413.687.1668
Photos for media use from WELC
Post-oral argument press conference with remarks from attorneys and youth plaintiffs
English 
Español de México 
Skip to content